jsburbidge: (Default)
jsburbidge ([personal profile] jsburbidge) wrote2009-04-20 04:20 pm
Entry tags:

Comedy


I have to disagree with this line in slacktivist's ongoing takedown of the Left Behind series: "Comedy is essentially revolutionary. This scene is counter-revolutionary. That's never funny."

Three counterexamples:

1) Aristophanes

2) Swift

3) Waugh

Reactionaries all.

You can finesse this observation by trying to claim that they're all statirists, and that satire isn't really comedy, but I don't think that flies.

The problem with Jenkins and La Haye is that they are (1) bad writers working with (2) really poor theology.  But I don't think that their problem is, as such, that they're reactionary rather than revolutionary, or that because they're reactionary they shouldn't try comedy.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting