jsburbidge: (Default)
jsburbidge ([personal profile] jsburbidge) wrote2015-08-31 09:34 pm
Entry tags:

Popularity in SFF redux

I read Eric Flint's latest post on popularity, and something kept bothering me, until I realized that he had got one thing subtly wrong: He is measuring the popularity of authors,  not of works.

Sure, David Weber is more popular, by measurement of shelf space, than Lois McMaster Bujold: but that's partly because Weber publishes two to three books a year and Bujold one (fewer recently, as she hasn't been entirely well, I understand). More to the point: how do War of Honor and Paladin of Souls (published at about the same time, the latter winning both a Hugo and a Nebula) compare in total sales? How does Shadow of Freedom stack up against Ancillary Justice (both 2013 novels)?

Flint's measure regards a combined metric of popular and prolific. (Martin and Tolkien are the exceptions: small sets of volumes with massive popularity, but a general estimate of high quality.) The measure of popularity appropriate for the Hugos is not by the author but by the work, and I have not seen any evidence that the normal Hugo winner of the past few years is necessarily significantly less popular than an average work by the "popular" authors.

Perhaps I should draw back from that claim a bit: the figures I looked at before suggest that Hugo winners are not necessarily among the very most popular SFF novels of their years, and that the disparity probably does reflect a judgement by Hugo voters tilted towards best rather than most popular. But I also think that it is generally true that Hugo winners and nominees are among the most popular SFF works of their years.