jsburbidge: (Default)
jsburbidge ([personal profile] jsburbidge) wrote 2018-07-17 08:19 pm (UTC)

It's essentially Miss Marple in a cassock and occasional soutane as far as the content goes.

The thing is, Chesterton's Brown does very little active detecting. In the later-set stories, Flambeau does do some leg-work, but Chesterton's point was that the antecedent knowledge of human nature and orthodox ontology gave Brown the perceptiveness to see through to the heart of a situation. He didn't do much material investigation.

The show substitutes standard amateur-detective plots for anything remotely Chestertonian. They also replace Brown's reliance on (what Chesterton saw as) fundamental orthodoxy, especially as regards human nature, with a generic attractive to the 21st century general humanism. It's also badly researched; it looked very much to me as though the writers couldn't really tell the difference between the RCs and the C of E, which is actually minimal in practice today in terms of integration into society - the C of E has become in practice less familiar and the RCs have become far more thoroughly integrated - but was significant in the period.

There really isn't much left, after all that's gone.


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting