Sunt Lacrimae Rerum

I think even worse than active vs passive is the marshalling of conservative invective without much context. One theory I have is that CBC leads with conservative/PR talking points, but then balances the coverage by the end. For example, in that article, near the end, the author covers PP's duplicity:

As of Thursday, Poilievre had answered around half as many questions during the campaign as Carney, according to Radio-Canada.