Date: 2019-12-07 06:02 pm (UTC)
graydon: (Default)
From: [personal profile] graydon
It might be simpler than that; it might be important to introduce the normalcy of ambiguity early.

My writing collects reviews along the lines of "should have been edited; grammar is all wrong" or even "order of address in communications is backwards, an editor should have fixed it"; these aren't the majority of the reviews by any means, but I think it's instructive to consider where that intense certainty that a work of fantasy is wrong comes from. I think "straight up hates and considers invalid any ambiguity of meaning" is a clear candidate, and the process of engaging with classics you're describing -- and which hundred-year-old-and-more Victorian and Edwardian and even inter-war Georgian vernacular texts describe as the experience of engaging with classics -- insists that, no, no, you're going to engage with what it could mean, not what it does mean, and this has a vital social function in education.

(It does a really good job of explaining why the 80s attempt to push highschool CS as a replacement for Latin makes no sense, too.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jsburbidge: (Default)
jsburbidge

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
67 89101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 01:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios